Christmas Eve and look at how The Red Star removes valid criticism
This entry was posted on 12/24/2007 9:16 AM and is filed under TheRedStar.
|
Comment #364859 rejected from StarNet |
This is a courtesy message to let you know that your comment has been
rejected from our website for violating the StarNet User
Guidelines.
Original comment follows:
———-
Harry D. (Dog Dude (Blue heeler))
This is nothing more then more Red Star propaganda promoting lawlessness by
trying to paint illegal aliens as good people when they are nothing more the
lawbreakers.
Because the Red Star lies so much abut this one has to ask...
bq. Newly arrived Guatemalan immigrants tend to settle in the same
neighborhoods as Mexican immigrants.
Are they really immigrants?
Or are they illegal alien law breakers?
Do try to be honest with your readers Red Star because it reflect on your
advertisers, I don't know about others but I avoid any business that advertises
in a rag that consistently lies to me about important issues and promotes the
invasion of my country and State by criminals from south of us.
I do have to wonder why the Red Star does not promote very poor illegal
aliens Black's from Africa?
Not once have I seen this paper stand up for Black illegal aliens demanding
they be allows to come here by the 10s of millions illegally
Using the logic (or lack of) of the pro-Raza (RACE) invader gang that
means you hate Blacks.
Come to think of it I can't remember poster 1,3,4,5,and 6 ever taking a
pro- poor Black illegal alien stand either.
you know what that means about poster 1,3,4,5, and 6. using that poster's
logic, or lack of.
The big violation above was translating the "Raza" part of "La Raze" into English which is "The Race".
In the last line I challenged poster 1,3,4,5, and 6's Logic. That's not a violation of the guide lines.
